Opinion

Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

  • 51 F.2d 823
Court
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Filed
Aug 11, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Kennamer
On the bench
Kennamer, Cotteral, Phillips
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

KENNAMER, District Judge

(dissenting).

I concur in the opinion of the majority of the court, holding the penalty provisions of the Conservation Aet unconstitutional, and that the corporation commission has power under the regulatory provisions of the act to enter orders enjoining oil operators committing actual waste in the production of oil and gas. I dissent from that part of the opinion sustaining the orders of the commission permitting the administration of the Conservation Aet through privately paid agents of interested parties in the production and marketing of oil and gas. I am further of the opinion that the orders of the commission are discriminatory and enforced in an unconstitutional manner. I shall file a formal dissenting opinion setting forth my views.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.