Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Lindholm

  • 66 F.2d 56
  • 89 A.L.R. 279
  • 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 2537
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jun 12, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Wilbur
On the bench
Wilbur, Sawtelle, Norcross
Cited by
24 cases

The opinion

WILBUR, Circuit Judge

(concurring).

In addition to the grounds stated in the main opinion for sustaining the ruling of the trial court on the objection to the question as to payments, I wish to add that evidence of payments made before the decree of distribution was not admissible, because, as we hold, the parties hereto are estopped by the decree of distribution to question the amount therein distributed to appellee.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.