Opinion

Casey v. United States

  • 20 F.2d 752
  • 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 2633
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Jun 27, 1927
Status
Published
Author
Rudkin
On the bench
Dietrich, Rudkin
Cited by
28 cases

The opinion

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge

(concurring). The concurrent judgment is supported by the second count alone, and for that reason I express no opinion as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict on the first count. I agree with Judge DIETRICH that the eases holding that the presumption arising from possession does not extend to the venue would seem to rob the statute of its efficacy; but, inasmuch as the courts of two circuits have so ruled, T think the question should be reserved until it becomes necessary to a decision of some case properly before us.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.