Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst

  • 102 F.2d 658
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Apr 28, 1939
Status
Published
Author
Stephens
On the bench
Garrecht, Haney, Stephens
Cited by
25 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

“Reinstatement means to return to a post previously held”

How later courts described this case

  • “Reinstatement means to return to a post previously held”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge,

concurring.

While I am in general agreement with the opinion prepared by Judge Haney, there is one statement therein to which I wish especially to refer. I quote from the opinion:

“Respondents contend that back pay may be awarded only with reinstatement, and since Armstrong cannot be reinstated, no back pay may be awarded. We think this-argument is partially sound. As said in National Labor Relations Bd. v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 9 Cir., supra, 99 F.2d 537 , the act does not ‘permit an award of back pay without reinstatement’ but the controlling time with respect to the ‘reinstatement’ provision is the ‘time of the Board’s order’. (Page 538). Since Armstrong could have been reinstated when the Board’s order was. made, back pay could properly be awarded.”

In my concurring opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 95 F.2d 533, 543 , my divergent views on the subject of back pay with or without reinstatement are pointed out, and I do not wish any expression in this case to be taken as a recession therefrom. See National Labor Relations Board v. Fan-steel Metallurgical Corporation, 59 S.Ct-490, 83 L.Ed.-.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.