Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Margiotti v. Orsini

  • 368 Pa. 259
  • 81 A.2d 891
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 27, 1951
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Drew, Stern, Stearne, Jones, Bell, Ladner
Cited by
27 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

the only power of subpoena the Attorney General possesses is that given by an act of the legislature – subpoena power, and the extent thereof, is to be determined in each case by the express statutory grant

How later courts described this case

  • the only power of subpoena the Attorney General possesses is that given by an act of the legislature – subpoena power, and the extent thereof, is to be determined in each case by the express statutory grant
  • concurring opinion by Jones, J.
  • construing Pennsylvania’s administrative laws
  • Attorney General cannot issue subpoenas to witnesses to appear at his offices

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones:

I concur in the result. For a searching and well-considered criticism of the decision in Margiotti Ap peal, 365 Pa. 330 , 75 A. 2d 465 , see Temple Law Quarterly, Vol. 24, p. 445 et seq.

Mr. Justice Ladner joins in this concurrence.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.