Opinion

Schellberg v. Empringham

  • 36 F.2d 991
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1758
Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
Jul 30, 1929
Status
Published
On the bench
Knox
Cited by
23 cases

The opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Defendants’ motion for a rehearing in the above-entitled ease will be denied. It is quite possible that my views of the law upon the issues presented by the suits are erroneous; but, if so, the correction of my mistakes must be made by the appellate court. In other words, I do not believe that a reargument will change the opinion heretofore filed. The case was given earnest effort and study in an attempt to reach a just result. For the purpose of ascertaining if my effort in that direction had failed, I have read the brief filed in support of the present petition. It does not change my previously expressed opinion.

Upon the approval by the clerk of the costs assessed in plaintiffs’ proposed decree, the same will be signed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.