Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stern

  • 515 Pa. 68
  • 526 A.2d 1180
  • 1987 Pa. LEXIS 716
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 3, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Papadakos
On the bench
Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos
Cited by
62 cases

holding disbarment was proper where the attorney helped a client illegally pay a union official

How later courts described this case

  • holding disbarment was proper where the attorney helped a client illegally pay a union official
  • “In addition to protecting the public, it is our responsibility to seek to preserve public confidence in the legal profession and the judicial system.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PAPADAKOS, Justice,

concurring.

I join the majority opinion, but write, separately to express my personal dismay in the fate that has befallen Respondent as the result of his misconduct. His illustrious background and prominence in the legal community serve to magnify his ethical breaches. It is entirely appropriate to expect the most meticulous adherence to ethical standards from those with exceptional ability. Such attorneys should serve as models for the other members of the Bar and as public symbols of the highest professional ideals. When a member of the elite, such as Respondent, debases himself and violates the law for sheer personal gain, public confidence in the legal profession is destroyed.

Respondent has no right to expect less than disbarment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.