describing policy underpinnings of doctrine of “col- lateral estoppel,” now known as “issue preclusion”
How later courts described this case
- describing policy underpinnings of doctrine of “col- lateral estoppel,” now known as “issue preclusion”
- “[I]t appears to be well settled that the husband and wife are not necessarily in privity”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
McAllister, J.,
dissenting.
In my opinion Wolff v. Du Puis, 233 Or 317 , 378 P2d 707 (1963) was correctly decided and should control this ease. I dissent.