Opinion

Estate of Teel

  • 34 Cal. 2d 349
  • 210 P.2d 1
  • 1949 Cal. LEXIS 166
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 30, 1949
Status
Published
Author
Schauer
On the bench
Carter, Schauer, Traynor
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

SCHAUER, J.

I dissent. I do not agree that “The court made such an assignment [of the recorded homestead, the existence of which was unknown to the court and to the petitioner, and which was not mentioned in either the property settlement agreement or in the interlocutory decree] by approving the agreement by which petitioner agreed to convey all his interest in the property to decedent and waived all his rights therein.” Such holding is inconsistent in principle with the very cases cited earlier in the opinion. The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.