Opinion

City of Culver City v. Superior Court

  • 38 Cal. 2d 535
  • 241 P.2d 258
  • 1952 Cal. LEXIS 200
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 3, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Carter
On the bench
Schauer, Edmonds, Carter
Cited by
18 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.1%

in California the distinction between civil and criminal contempt is not critical since the proceedings for criminal and civil contempt are the same with those procedural rights and safeguards appropriate for criminal contempt afforded in civil contempt proceedings

How later courts described this case

  • in California the distinction between civil and criminal contempt is not critical since the proceedings for criminal and civil contempt are the same with those procedural rights and safeguards appropriate for criminal contempt afforded in civil contempt proceedings

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CARTER, J.

I dissent for the same reasons as are set forth in my dissenting opinion in City of Vernon v. Superior Court, ante, p. 522 [ 241 P.2d 243 ], this day filed.

The opinion was modified to read as above printed and petitioners’ application for a rehearing was denied April 2, 1952. Carter, J., was of the opinion that the application should be granted.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.