Opinion

Langham v. State

  • 787 P.2d 1279
  • 1990 OK CR 9
  • 1990 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 12
  • 1990 WL 17038
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Feb 22, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Brett
On the bench
Johnson, Lumpkin, Parks, Brett, Lane
Cited by
23 cases

finding search warrant invalid because the plain language of 22 O.S. § 1223, requiring a search warrant be supported by affidavit, was not followed

How later courts described this case

  • finding search warrant invalid because the plain language of 22 O.S. § 1223, requiring a search warrant be supported by affidavit, was not followed
  • finding search warrant invalid because the plain language of 22 O.S. § 1228, requiring a search warrant be supported by affidavit, was not followed
  • art. II. § 30 interpreted same as the Fourth Amendment for purposes of determining validity of search warrant
  • Parks, P.J., concurring in result

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BRETT, Judge,

concurring in result:

I strongly disagree with the majority’s decision to abandon the Aguilar-Spinelli standard in favor of that set forth in Illinois v. Gates. Accordingly, I would concur in result for the same reasons stated by Judge Parks.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.