Opinion

Worth & Co. v. Department of Labor & Industry

  • 595 Pa. 69
  • 938 A.2d 239
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 27, 2007
Status
Published
Author
Castille
On the bench
Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Former
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.0%

acknowledging that in addition to the - 13 - J-A18034-22 remedies under subsections 165-11(e) and (f), workers have a civil right of action under Section 165-13

How later courts described this case

  • acknowledging that in addition to the - 13 - J-A18034-22 remedies under subsections 165-11(e) and (f), workers have a civil right of action under Section 165-13

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Justice CASTILLE,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The Majority affirms the decision of the Commonwealth Court reversing the Order of the Prevailing Wage Appeal Board. For the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of the Honorable Dante R. Pellegrini below, I would reverse the opinion of the Commonwealth Court and remand this matter to the Board for further consideration consistent with Judge Pellegrini’s dissenting opinion. See Worth & Co. v. Dept. of Labor and Industry, 857 A.2d 727, 735-37 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) (Pellegrini, J., dissenting).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.