Opinion

Hall v. Kiger

  • 795 A.2d 497
  • 2002 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 174
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Apr 4, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Kelley
On the bench
Doyle, Colins, McGinley, Smith-Ribner, Friedman, Kelley, Leadbetter
Cited by
20 cases

borough councilman acted in the scope of his authority when he made allegedly defamatory statements in the context of a public meeting while performing his duty as councilman

How later courts described this case

  • borough councilman acted in the scope of his authority when he made allegedly defamatory statements in the context of a public meeting while performing his duty as councilman

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Senior Judge KELLEY

concurs in result only.

ORDER

NOW, this 4th day of April 2002, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The order is affirmed to the extent that it struck the jury’s award of punitive damages. The order is reversed inasmuch as it denied Appellant William Kiger, Jr.’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. This case is remanded to the trial court for entry of an order consistent with this decision.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.