Opinion

Frink v. Prod

  • 31 Cal. 3d 166
  • 181 Cal. Rptr. 893
  • 643 P.2d 476
  • 1982 Cal. LEXIS 169
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 8, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Mosk
On the bench
Broussard, Mosk, Newman
Cited by
104 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.0%

The opinion

MOSK, J.

J. — I concur.

I agree with the conclusion of the majority for the reasons expressed more than a decade ago in my concurring opinion in Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130, 161 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 234 , 481 P.2d 242 ], Although Bixby involved a professional license, my point that an applicant and a licensee should be measured by the same standard was sound then, and it is equally sound here as adapted to the qualifications of an allegedly permanently disabled person applying for public assistance.

Bird, C. J., concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.