holding that a motion for en banc reconsideration should be- denied as moot when the panel denies a motion for rehearing but issues a new opinion and judgment
How later courts described this case
- holding that a motion for en banc reconsideration should be- denied as moot when the panel denies a motion for rehearing but issues a new opinion and judgment
- stating motion for en banc reconsideration rendered moot by withdrawal and reissuance of opinion and judgment
- noting that motion for en *71 banc reconsideration is rendered moot by withdrawal and reissuance of opinion and judgment
- providing expert report before health care liability claim is filed in court against physician or health care provider does not meet former 74.351(a)’s service requirement
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Justice TAFT,
concurring in the denial of en banc consideration. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.5.