Opinion

People v. Tillis

  • 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 447
  • 18 Cal. 4th 284
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 6619
  • 956 P.2d 409
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4691
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 18, 1998
Status
Published
Author
Mosk
On the bench
Werdegar, Mosk
Cited by
32 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.0%

The opinion

MOSK, J., Concurring.

Accepting for present purposes that Proposition 115’s statutory discovery scheme is valid (but see Izazaga v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 356, 387-402 [ 285 Cal.Rptr. 231 , 815 P.2d 304 ] (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.)), I concur in the opinion of the court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.