“The project entailed the renovation of existing fish ponds. That fact alone, absent any specific site inspection provision, should have alerted a bidder to the possibility of wet conditions.”
How later courts described this case
- “The project entailed the renovation of existing fish ponds. That fact alone, absent any specific site inspection provision, should have alerted a bidder to the possibility of wet conditions.”
- Attorney's fees where partially awarded against the State pursuant to an award for labor and services rendered by a private individual.
- “Lost profits in such a case will not be awarded where the contractor presented neither evidence of its profits for preceding years nor an expert analysis with a breakdown of damages."
- general contractor sued OHahoma Board of Public Affairs for breach of contract when the contractor was removed from the job
Written by the judges who cited it.
Distinguished
Distinguished by Transpower Constructors v. Grand River Dam Authority, 905 F.2d 1413 (1990)
Contrary to Transpower’s assertion, Cook and City of Tulsa are distinguishable from this case.
The opinion
SIMMS, Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I dissent only to awarding Cook prejudgment interest and attorney’s fees.
KAUGER, J., disqualified.