Opinion

Suter v. United States

  • 153 F. Supp. 367
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Jul 12, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Laramore
On the bench
Jones, Littleton, Whitaker, Madden, Laramore
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.0%

The opinion

LARAMORE, Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent for the reason I believe plaintiff’s claim is barred by the 6-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501 .

Plaintiff was separated from active service on June 9, 1946. He did not apply to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records until 1953. We have many times held that his cause of action first accrued when he was released from active duty, and resort to the correction board would not toll the statute of limitations. Levadi v. United States, Ct.Cl., 146 F.Supp. 455 ; Barker v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 415 , 135 Ct.Cl. 42 ; Rosnick v. United States, 129 F.Supp. 958 , 132 F.Supp. 478 , 132 Ct.Cl. 1 ; MacFarlane v. United States, 140 F.Supp. 420 , 134 Ct.Cl. 755 ; Duff v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 527 , 133 Ct.Cl. 161 .

Plaintiff’s petition was filed June 29, 1954,. more than six years thereafter.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.