Opinion

Cothran v. Brown

  • 350 S.C. 352
  • 566 S.E.2d 548
  • 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 76
Court
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Filed
May 13, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Goolsby
On the bench
Hearn, Cureton, Connor, Huff, Manning, Goolsby, Stilwell, Anderson, Pyle
Cited by
2 cases

In a subsequent civil action for wrongful death brought against the man convicted of driving under the influence and reckless homicide, the court held that judicial estoppel applied to prevent the defendant from contradicting his previous guilty plea.

How later courts described this case

  • In a subsequent civil action for wrongful death brought against the man convicted of driving under the influence and reckless homicide, the court held that judicial estoppel applied to prevent the defendant from contradicting his previous guilty plea.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

GOOLSBY, J.,

(concurring):

I concur only in Part II of the majority opinion and would not reach the issue relating to judicial estoppel.

*363 STILWELL, J.:

I join in Judge Goolsby’s concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.