Opinion

Bowman v. Webster

  • 42 Wash. 2d 129
  • 253 P.2d 934
  • 1953 Wash. LEXIS 422
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 26, 1953
Status
Published
Author
Olson
On the bench
Hamley
Cited by
55 cases

“Where the findings of fact are incomplete or defective in some particular so that a doubt exists as to the theory on which the case was decided, we are sometimes able to overcome the difficulty by referring to the oral or memorandum decision of the trial court.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Where the findings of fact are incomplete or defective in some particular so that a doubt exists as to the theory on which the case was decided, we are sometimes able to overcome the difficulty by referring to the oral or memorandum decision of the trial court.”
  • equity action for specific performance

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*137 Olson, J.

(dissenting)—As the majority opinion states, findings of fact on the basic issues are nonexistent in this case.

We can only review the record which appellants bring to this court. If that record is insufficient to sustain the relief sought by the appeal, it would seem to follow that the appeal must fail.

Mallery, Schwellenbach, and Donworth, JJ., concur with Olson, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.