Opinion

Fuentes v. Faircloth

  • 317 F. Supp. 954
  • 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10481
Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
Aug 21, 1970
Status
Published
Author
Eaton
On the bench
Dyer, Mehrtens, Eaton
Cited by
29 cases

Reversed by Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972)

Florida replevin statute, F. S. §§ 78.01 et seq. F. S. A.

How later courts described this case

  • Florida replevin statute, F. S. §§ 78.01 et seq. F. S. A.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

EATON, District Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. I believe the question of the constitutionality of § 78.10, F.S.A. is before the Court and that the pre-judgment replevin procedure established by §§ 78.01, 78.04, 78.07, 78.08 and 78.10, F.S.A., lacks the essential elements of due process.

When the state authorizes the forcible entry of a person’s house prior to the establishment of the probable validity of a creditor’s claim, it contravenes the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Further, when one signs a contract which includes the words “in the event of default of any payment or payments, seller at its option may take back the merchandise,” he does not waive his Fourteenth Amendment right to “due process of law.”

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.