Opinion

Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

  • 260 Or. 564
  • 491 P.2d 997
  • 1971 Ore. LEXIS 341
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 15, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Beyson
On the bench
Moallister, Beyson, O'Connell, McAllister, Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson
Cited by
52 cases

description of this scope of review as de novo

How later courts described this case

  • description of this scope of review as de novo

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BEYSON, J.,

concurring in part; dissenting in part.

I concur with the majority decision that this court should not hear de novo workmen’s compensation cases. I dissent, however, from that part of the decision of the Court of Appeals which remands this case to the hearing officer.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.