noting that “[t]here are so many cases in which a reference to a commissioner is necessary,” including “the more effectual working out of details which the judge sitting in court is unable to investigate, or to make some specific inquiry necessary to satisfy the conscience of the chancellor” (internal quotation marks omitted)
How later courts described this case
- noting that “[t]here are so many cases in which a reference to a commissioner is necessary,” including “the more effectual working out of details which the judge sitting in court is unable to investigate, or to make some specific inquiry necessary to satisfy the conscience of the chancellor” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*236 Eggleston and Whittle, JJ.,
concurring.
The opinion of the Chief Justice clearly demonstrates that the rule promulgated by the lower court with respect to references in divorce suits is sound in principle and proper in form. Having reached this conclusion, we see no occasion for holding that it should be modified and restricted.