reasonable inference could be drawn from evidence to support trial court’s finding that the plaintiff was a resident of the insured’s household
How later courts described this case
- reasonable inference could be drawn from evidence to support trial court’s finding that the plaintiff was a resident of the insured’s household
- “Wherever the description ‘named insured’ is used, the only person named in the declarations of the policy is meant.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
HOLMAN, J.,
specially concurring.
I agree with that part of the majority opinion which holds that the issue of whether the decedent was a “designated” insured was not litigated by the trial court and, therefore, we should not determine the issue on appeal. Because the case was not tried with this issue in mind, we cannot be sure that we have all the information available which would throw light upon the matter.