Opinion

Knoll v. Davidson

  • 12 Cal. 3d 335
  • 116 Cal. Rptr. 97
  • 525 P.2d 1273
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 15, 1974
Status
Published
Author
Mosk
On the bench
Sullivan, Mosk, Burke, Wright, Tobriner, McComb
Cited by
65 cases

holding that similar former provision in California Constitution precluded enactment of statute establishing local residency requirements for superior court judges

How later courts described this case

  • holding that similar former provision in California Constitution precluded enactment of statute establishing local residency requirements for superior court judges
  • defined by ability to pay

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MOSK, J.

I concur.

I agree fully with points I and III of the majority opinion. On point II, I would have joined Justice Burke in dissent but for the occurrence of subsequent events which have rendered that issue moot. As indicated in footnote 11 of the majority opinion, the Legislature has now provided methods alternative to the payment of fees for the qualification of candidates for public office.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.