holding that “arguments of counsel” do not “qualify as evidence for purposes of a statement of the evidence”
How later courts described this case
- holding that “arguments of counsel” do not “qualify as evidence for purposes of a statement of the evidence”
- “[I]n order to be a useful substitute for a trial transcript, the statement must ‘convey a fair, accurate, and complete account of what transpired [in the trial court] with respect to those issues that are the bases of appeal.’” (quoting Tenn. R. App. P. 24(c))
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ORDER DENYING APPELLANTS’ AMENDED PETITION FOR REHEARING
The Appellants Bank of New York, Trustee, and Philip M. Kleinsmith, Trustee, filed an Amended Petition for Rehearing in this case. Upon due consideration, the amended petition for rehearing is denied. Costs are taxed to Appellants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.