Opinion

In the Matter of Treacy

  • 277 S.C. 514
  • 290 S.E.2d 240
  • 1982 S.C. LEXIS 309
Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Filed
Apr 1, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Harwell
On the bench
Harwell, Per Curiam
Cited by
104 cases

recognizing that an attorney's failure to respond to the ODC constitutes sanctionable misconduct

How later courts described this case

  • recognizing that an attorney's failure to respond to the ODC constitutes sanctionable misconduct
  • explaining that failure to respond to a disciplinary authority constitutes misconduct
  • declaring that failure to respond to disciplinary inquiries is misconduct and grounds for sanction
  • A Treacy letter points out that the failure to respond to ODC constitutes sanctionable conduct.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Harwell, Justice

(dissenting):

I disagree with the majority as to the appropriate sanction to be imposed. Both the Panel and Board recommended that the respondent be publicly reprimanded. I would accept their recommendation and publicly reprimand the respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.