Opinion

People v. Williams

  • 9 Cal. 3d 24
  • 106 Cal. Rptr. 622
  • 506 P.2d 998
  • 1973 Cal. LEXIS 173
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 12, 1973
Status
Published
Author
McCOMB
On the bench
McComb
Cited by
24 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.6%

Disapproved in part by People v. Cromer, 24 Cal. 889 (2001)

Later courts went against this

  • Disapproved in part by People v. Cromer, 24 Cal. 889 (2001)

    To the extent they contain language inconsistent with this conclusion, we disapprove these decisions: People v. Jackson, supra, 28 Cal.3d 264; People v. Enriquez, supra, 19 Cal.3d 221; People v. Williams, supra, 9 Cal.3d 24; People v. Dunn, supra, 29 Cal.2d 654; People v. Lepe, supra, 57 Cal.App.4th 977; People v. Walton, supra, 42 Cal.App.4th 1004; People v. Saucedo, supra, 33 Cal.App.4th 1230; People v. Guiterrez,…
    California Supreme CourtJan 22, 20012 citing opinionsin partRead it

The opinion

McCOMB, J.

I concur in the majority opinion, except that, for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628, 657 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 493 P.2d 880 ], I dissent from the modification of the judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.