describing a mistake as “fundamental in character” where it “‘relate[s] to the intrinsic nature of the bargain’” (quoting Williston, 13 Contracts § 1544, at 94 (3d ed.))
How later courts described this case
- describing a mistake as “fundamental in character” where it “‘relate[s] to the intrinsic nature of the bargain’” (quoting Williston, 13 Contracts § 1544, at 94 (3d ed.))
- court disregarded a concession after it examined the record and concluded that the evidence was inconsistent with the concession
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
TONGUE, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent for the same reasons as stated in my original opinion in this case. , \ .
Holman, J., joins in this dissent.