relying on § 1089(C) to deny claims for post-conviction relief which “could have been raised on direct appeal, but were not”
How later courts described this case
- relying on § 1089(C) to deny claims for post-conviction relief which “could have been raised on direct appeal, but were not”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
LANE, Judge,
concur in results.
¶ 1 I concur in results by reason of stare decisis. I maintain my disagreement with the majority in its interpretation of the new post-conviction relief statute as I expressed in Conover v. State, 1997 OK CR 39 ¶¶ 1-5 , 942 P.2d 229, 234-35 (Lane, J., concur in result).