Opinion

Plantz v. State

  • 65 O.B.A.J. 1968
  • 876 P.2d 268
  • 1994 OK CR 33
  • 1994 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 38
  • 1994 WL 199991
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
May 20, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Chapel
On the bench
Lumpkin, Johnson, Lane, Strubhar, Chapel
Cited by
36 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.5%

co-conspirator tried as co-defendant and third party, recruited by defendants to join in murder scheme, testified against both

How later courts described this case

  • co-conspirator tried as co-defendant and third party, recruited by defendants to join in murder scheme, testified against both
  • trial court properly limited the defense’s voir dire on what jurors would consider as mitigation
  • defendant not entitled to investigator where he failed to make sufficient showing of need

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CHAPEL, Judge,

dissenting:

I.dissent in this case for the reasons I have set forth in Bryson v. State, 876 P.2d 240 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.