Opinion

Barton v. Harmon

  • 203 Okla. 274
  • 221 P.2d 656
  • 1950 OK 187
  • 1950 Okla. LEXIS 606
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Jul 11, 1950
Status
Published
Author
Welch
On the bench
Arnold, Luttrell, Halley, Johnson, O'Neal, Welch, Corn, Gibson
Cited by
9 cases

The opinion

WELCH, J.

(dissenting). The ordinances were incorporated into the bond by reference and (on defendant’s motion to require same) complete copies were attached. Apparently during settling of the pleadings and at the trial the ordinances were considered by all as being sufficiently presented. It appears the defendants presented contentions based upon various provisions of the ordinances. _ Questions based on those contentions are important in settling the right and liabilities of the parties. I think we should consider them here, as they were considered in the trial court. It seems to me under all the circumstances the lack of formal introduction of the ordinances in evidence should not necessarily require reversal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.