Opinion

State v. Miller

67 Or. App. 637
680 P.2d 676
1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2968

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed: Apr 11, 1984
Status: Published
Author: Buttler
On the bench: Hoomissen, Van Hoomissen, Buttler, Richardson, Gillette, Young, Joseph, Newman
Cited by: 2 cases

The opinion

*650 BUTTLER, J.,

specially concurring.

Although I agree with Richardson, J., that defendant’s statements to Dr. Saville were privileged communications within the meaning of OEC 504 and should have been excluded, I agree with the majority that, in the peculiar context of this case, the error was harmless. Accordingly, I concur in the affirmance of defendant’s conviction.

Young, J., joins in this specially concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.