Opinion

Veriddo v. Renaud

  • 35 Cal. 2d 263
  • 217 P.2d 647
  • 1950 Cal. LEXIS 333
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 28, 1950
Status
Published
Author
Carter
On the bench
Schauer, Carter
Cited by
20 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.3%

The opinion

CARTER, J.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance, but in doing so, I do not wish to be understood as giving my approval to the decisions of this court in Artukovich v. Astendorf, 21 Cal.2d 329 [ 131 P.2d 831 ], and Powers Farms v. Consolidated Irr. Dist., 19 Cal.2d 123 [ 119 P.2d 717 ], cited in the majority opinion. I filed a dissenting opinion in both of the last mentioned cases, which, in my opinion, correctly stated the law applicable thereto. I do not consider either of these cases authority for the position taken by the majority in the case at bar, and my concurrence in the result reached in the majority opinion in this case is based solely upon my interpretation of the statute here involved (Gov. Code, § 1981) which compels the conclusion here reached.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.