the court held admissible the victim's statements to a pediatrician/child medical examiner concerning the identity of her abuser
How later courts described this case
- the court held admissible the victim's statements to a pediatrician/child medical examiner concerning the identity of her abuser
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*784 Chief Justice EXUM
concurring.
Were the Court deciding for the first time the issue of the admissibility of the testimony of Dr. Schaffer and Dr. Schroeder, I would hold this testimony admissible only for corroborative purposes for the reasons stated by then Chief Justice Billings, dissenting, in State v. Aguallo, 318 N.C. 590 , 350 S.E. 2d 76 (1986). Since the majority opinion in Aguaito controls this issue favorably to the state’s position and I am bound thereby, I concur in the opinion and decision here.