Opinion

Barnett v. State

  • 64 O.B.A.J. 1565
  • 853 P.2d 226
  • 1993 OK CR 26
  • 1993 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 29
  • 1993 WL 166416
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
May 18, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Johnson
On the bench
Lumpkin, Lane, Chapel, Johnson
Cited by
39 cases

where defendant could not be found to have murdered victim to avoid prosecution for assault and battery of the victim

How later courts described this case

  • where defendant could not be found to have murdered victim to avoid prosecution for assault and battery of the victim

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

JOHNSON, Vice Presiding Judge,

specially concurring:

While I specially concur with the decision of the Court herein I feel there are items *235 that must be pointed out relative to my concurrence. The Court has noted by footnote that the trial judge who tried this case, The Hon. Preston Trimble, made the note in his trial notes that the case should be modified from the sentence of death to life imprisonment. This is an exceedingly unpopular type of statement by a trial judge. .

If there is anyone who is in a position to oversee and/or monitor the evidence that comes into a case, it is the trial judge. He has the expertise to look at the evidence from a dispassionate point of view. I believe the trial judge that has the courage to make this sort of recommendation to this Court should be followed. Therefore, I acquiesce to the position of the trial judge and would also vote to affirm the conviction but modify the sentence to life imprisonment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.