Opinion

Burkes v. Klauser

  • 185 Wis. 2d 308
  • 517 N.W.2d 503
  • 1994 Wisc. LEXIS 100
Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 24, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Bablitch
On the bench
Shirley S. Abrahamson
Cited by
24 cases

granting summary judgment dismissing "the plaintiffs claim for damages against the defendants in their official capacity."

How later courts described this case

  • granting summary judgment dismissing "the plaintiffs claim for damages against the defendants in their official capacity."
  • “If issues of fact preclude granting the shelter of qualified immunity, the case should proceed to trial on the merits.”
  • "[I]f there are issues of disputed fact upon which immunity turns,. . .the case should proceed to trial."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J.

(concurring). I join both the reasoning and the result of the majority opinion. I also join the concurring opinion authored by Justice Wilcox. I write only to express a concern regarding one of the named defendants.

At oral argument, Mr. Burkes' attorney was asked the reason why Nicholas Hurtgen was named as a defendant in this matter. Although Hurtgen sometimes sits as trustee as the secretary's designee, Hurtgen did not sit as trustee in this particular matter, nor did he cast a vote. From the record before us, I can discern, at best, only peripheral involvement by Mr. Hurtgen. The answer given at oral argument was unsatisfactory.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.