Opinion

Stafford v. County of Bladen

  • 163 N.C. App. 149
  • 592 S.E.2d 711
  • 2004 N.C. App. LEXIS 305
Court
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Filed
Mar 2, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Hudson
On the bench
Tyson, Steelman, Hudson
Cited by
20 cases

affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant because plaintiffs' claims barred by res judicata

How later courts described this case

  • affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant because plaintiffs' claims barred by res judicata

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HUDSON, J.,

concurring in result.

Although I concur in the result here, I am not persuaded that res judicata applies to this scenario. None of the cases cited involve a case where the defendant in a civil case was barred by res judicata even though (1) he had no opportunity to be heard on his defense in an earlier case because (2) the plaintiff took a voluntary dismissal with prejudice, resulting in an adjudication on the merits against— rather than in favor of — the plaintiff. I would address and uphold the constitutionality of the fee.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.