Opinion

A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'n

  • 68 O.B.A.J. 1266
  • 936 P.2d 916
  • 1997 OK 37
  • 1997 Okla. LEXIS 39
  • 1997 WL 165417
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Apr 8, 1997
Status
Published
Author
Hodges
On the bench
Ala, Hodges, Kauger, Lavender, Simms, Hargrave, Opala, Wilson, Watt, Summers
Cited by
46 cases

“The continuous-ownership requirement is based on the belief that only a party with an ongoing proprietary interest in the corporation on behalf of which action is maintained will adequately represent the corporation’s interest in a derivative suit.”

How later courts described this case

  • “The continuous-ownership requirement is based on the belief that only a party with an ongoing proprietary interest in the corporation on behalf of which action is maintained will adequately represent the corporation’s interest in a derivative suit.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HODGES, J.,

concurs in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI and dissents from Part VII.

WATT, J., dissents.

SUMMERS, V.C.J., not participating.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.