Opinion

State v. Cummings

  • 323 N.C. 181
  • 372 S.E.2d 541
  • 1988 N.C. LEXIS 605
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Oct 6, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Frye
On the bench
Martin, Exum, Frye
Cited by
22 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.9%

finding the death penalty not disproportionate where it was imposed in four of five other cases in which a defendant was convicted of a prior violent felony resulting in the victim's death

How later courts described this case

  • finding the death penalty not disproportionate where it was imposed in four of five other cases in which a defendant was convicted of a prior violent felony resulting in the victim's death
  • finding death penalty proportionate where death penalty imposed in four of five other cases in which a defendant had been convicted of a prior violent felony resulting in the victim's death
  • prosecutor may argue to the jury about the demeanor of a witness, a matter which is before it

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Justice FRYE

dissenting as to sentence.

For the reasons expressed in the Chief Justice’s dissenting opinion in State v. McKoy, 323 N.C. 1 , 372 S.E. 2d 12 (1988), which I joined, I believe the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. ---, 100 L.Ed. 2d 384 (1988), requires that defendant be given a new sentencing hearing. Accordingly, I dissent from that portion of the Court’s opinion which rejects defendant’s argument based upon the holding of Mills . I concur in the remainder of the Court’s opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.