Opinion

Gaines v. Maynard

  • 62 O.B.A.J. 934
  • 808 P.2d 672
  • 1991 OK 27
  • 1991 Okla. LEXIS 28
  • 1991 WL 35096
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Mar 19, 1991
Status
Published
Author
Simms
On the bench
Summers, Lavender, Doolin, Wilson, Johnson, Kauger, Opala, Simms, Hargrave
Cited by
15 cases

The opinion

SIMMS, Justice,

dissenting:

I would deny certiorari as improvidently granted. The trial court and the Court of Appeals correctly found that these petitioners have not alleged any breach of a legal duty which would entitle them to a writ of mandamus.

I am authorized to state that Vice Chief Justice HODGES and Justice HARGRAVE join with me in the views expressed above.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.