Opinion

Hatch v. State

  • 924 P.2d 284
  • 1996 WL 455843
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Nov 26, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Lane
On the bench
Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel, Lane, Strubhar
Cited by
28 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.8%

"The issue of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, like any other claim, must be raised at the first available opportunity."

How later courts described this case

  • "The issue of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, like any other claim, must be raised at the first available opportunity."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LANE, Judge,

concurring in results.

I concur in the results of the majority, but I write to confirm my position on the allegation the Information prosecuted in this case did not confer jurisdiction on the trial court.

I still maintain the position I took in Parker v. State, 917 P.2d 980 (OH.Cr.1996). I assert that the reasoning I expressed therein applies to this case and an affirmance is warranted but not for the reasons expressed by the majority.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.