Opinion

Cooper v. Brown

  • 565 F.3d 581
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10944
  • 2009 WL 1272436
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
May 11, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Rymer, McKeown, Gould, Fletcher, Wardlaw, Fisher, Reinhardt
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 56.4%

"[I]f state actors planted this evidence, its presentation at trial violated Cooper's due process rights under Mooney and Napue”

How later courts described this case

  • "[I]f state actors planted this evidence, its presentation at trial violated Cooper's due process rights under Mooney and Napue”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to hear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. RApp. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.