Opinion

People v. Leach

  • 41 Cal. 3d 92
  • 221 Cal. Rptr. 826
  • 710 P.2d 893
  • 1985 Cal. LEXIS 443
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 31, 1985
Status
Published
Author
Broussard
On the bench
Kaus, Mosk, Bird, Broussard
Cited by
48 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.7%

The opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

I concur in the plurality opinion of Justice Kaus in all but two matters. First, in my opinion the torture-murder special circumstance falls, not because of incorrect jury instructions, but because the underlying statutory provision violates the Eighth Amendment. (See People v. Davenport (1985) post, 247, 290 [ 221 Cal.Rptr. 794 , 710 P.2d. 861 ] (cone. opn. of Bird, C. J.), id. at p. 295 (cone. opn. of Broussard, J.).) Second, I would rest reversal of the penalty judgment not only on the “no sympathy” instruction discussed by *115 the plurality, but also on the court’s erroneous instruction respecting the Governor’s power to commute a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. (See People v. Ramos (1984) 37 Cal.3d 136, 153-159 [ 207 Cal.Rptr. 800 , 689 P.2d 430 ].)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.