Opinion

McCormick v. State

  • 64 O.B.A.J. 96
  • 845 P.2d 896
  • 1993 OK CR 6
  • 1993 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 2
  • 1993 WL 4200
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Jan 12, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Lumpkin
On the bench
Lane, Vice-Presiding, Brett, Johnson, Lumpkin
Cited by
48 cases

finding that quoted instruction "would not have been inappropriate in this instance"

How later courts described this case

  • finding that quoted instruction "would not have been inappropriate in this instance"
  • noting first degree manslaughter is a lesser included offense of the crime of first degree murder

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LUMPKIN, Vice-Presiding Judge:

concurring in results.

I concur in the results reached by the court and agree that 21 O.S.Supp.1987, § 701.9 requires a bifurcated trial only when the death penalty is sought by the State. However, I cannot join in an analysis of “heat of passion”, as it applies to Oklahoma statutes and jurisprudence when the discussion is supported only by federal caselaw interpreting federal statutes. The issue raised requires interpretation of Oklahoma statutes and prior decisions of this Court. While those decisions may embrace concepts which require analysis of federal constitutional law, we should not abdicate the responsibility or necessity to address independent State questions based on an interpretation of our State statutes.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.