Opinion

State v. Brown

  • 312 N.C. 237
  • 321 S.E.2d 856
  • 1984 N.C. LEXIS 1796
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Nov 6, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Exum
On the bench
Branch, Exum
Cited by
61 cases

finding error where the judge "instructed the jury that to convict of first-degree kidnapping they must find that defendant 'sexually assaulted' the victim, rather than that he failed to release her in a safe place" as the indictment charged

How later courts described this case

  • finding error where the judge "instructed the jury that to convict of first-degree kidnapping they must find that defendant 'sexually assaulted' the victim, rather than that he failed to release her in a safe place" as the indictment charged
  • holding that when the trial court charged the jury on an additional purpose for kidnapping not listed in the indictment and the State presented no evidence on such theory, the jury instructions constituted plain error
  • stating that vaginal intercourse includes the " slightest penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ"
  • granting a new kidnapping trial where a judge instructed that the defendant could be found guilty if he removed, restrained or confined the alleged victim for the purpose of terrorizing her, rather than for the purpose of facilitating the commission of a felony, as alleged in the indictment

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Justice Exum

dissenting in part.

I dissent from! so much of the majority decision which holds that defendant was not entitled to an instruction on the lesser included offense of attempted rape. The majority correctly states the law and the evidence bearing on this issue. The majority errs, however, in concluding that the victim’s testimony is not equivocal on the question of penetration. To me, her testimony on this *251 issue is the epitome of equivocation. It is enough to carry the issue to the jury; but it leaves the issue in enough doubt that the jury should have been permitted to consider as an alternative verdict defendant’s guilt of attempted rape on the theory that there was, in fact, no penetration.

I, therefore, vote for a new trial in the rape case for failure of the trial court to submit the lesser included offense of attempted rape.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.