Opinion

Oakridge Invsestments, Inc. v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc.

  • 719 P.2d 848
  • 1986 OK CIV APP 8
  • 1986 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 43
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
May 6, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Bacon
On the bench
Means, Reif, Bacon
Cited by
5 cases

"The Oklahoma antitrust statutes are similar to federal antitrust legislation."

How later courts described this case

  • "The Oklahoma antitrust statutes are similar to federal antitrust legislation."

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BACON, Presiding Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the majority. Plaintiff’s petition alleges in count one, restraint of trade, and in count two, tortious interference with contractual relations. The plaintiff does not plead or argue breach of contract, but pleads only restraint of trade and tortious interference. In my opinion, the trial court correctly sustained summary judgment on the two counts alleged. Since breach of contract was never pleaded or argued, I agree the trial court should be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.