Opinion

Johnson v. State

  • 952 P.2d 1003
  • 1998 OK CR 13
  • 1998 WL 30535
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Jan 29, 1998
Status
Published
Author
Lane
On the bench
Johnson, Chapel, Strubhar, Lumpkin, Lane
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 5.4%

The opinion

LANE, Judge,

concurring in results:

¶ 1 I concur in results by reason of stare decisis. I maintain my disagreement -with the majority in its interpretation of the new post-conviction relief statute as I expressed in Conover v. State, 1997 OK CR 39 ¶¶ 1-5 , 942 P.2d 229, 234-35 , (Lane, J., concur in result).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.