Opinion

State v. Durham

  • 545 P.2d 805
  • 1976 OK CR 20
  • 1976 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 704
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Jan 29, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Brett
On the bench
Bliss, Bussey, Brett
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

BRETT, Presiding Judge

(concurring in results) :

I concur in the results of this decision as it pertains to a “Motion to Quash the Information” as a pre-trial motion. In the instant case the defendant has not been placed in jeopardy; and, therefore, under the facts stated he should stand trial for the offense committed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.