Opinion

Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit Appeals

  • 66 Cal. 2d 34
  • 56 Cal. Rptr. 672
  • 423 P.2d 824
  • 1967 Cal. LEXIS 280
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 24, 1967
Status
Published
Author
McComb
On the bench
Tobriner, McComb
Cited by
52 cases

under an ordinance making permit final when “lawfully granted” as substitute for judicial doctrine of substantial beginning of construction

How later courts described this case

  • under an ordinance making permit final when “lawfully granted” as substitute for judicial doctrine of substantial beginning of construction

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McComb, J.,

I concur in the judgment.

The petition of appellants HAP Development Co., Haas & Haynie Corp. and HAP Development Partnership for a rehearing was denied March 22, 1967.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.